Which of the following statements is true regarding the harvest price limitation in revenue protection plans?

Prepare for the Kansas Crop Insurance Test. Use multiple choice questions accompanied by hints and explanations. Ensure your readiness for the exam!

The harvest price limitation in revenue protection plans is designed to provide a safeguard for producers while also recognizing the potential for market fluctuations. This limitation is important because it ensures that when claims are made, they are based on reasonable expectations of market conditions.

The correct statement reflects that the harvest price cannot exceed 200 percent of the projected price. This means that if the market conditions lead to a significantly higher harvest price due to various factors such as demand or lower supply, the maximum payout on a claim will still have an upper limit, which is double the projected price. This rule is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the insurance program, as it protects both the insurance companies and the farmers by avoiding extreme payouts in very volatile markets.

In contrast, the other statements do not accurately depict the rules surrounding harvest prices. For instance, the idea that the harvest price cannot exceed 150 percent of the projected price is inaccurate, as the regulation allows for a broader range up to 200 percent. The assertion that the harvest price is always lower than the projected price misconstrues how these prices function, as the harvest price is often determined after the growing season and may exceed the projected price based on actual conditions. Finally, claiming that there is no limitation on the harvest price is

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy